
By Kate Brown
More than three decades ago, a reactor at the Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant in the Ukrainian republic of the Soviet Union exploded. A fierce fire burned for the following two weeks, sending columns of radioactive gases and particles across the European landscape and beyond. The accident is an enduring subject of fascination – HBO recently adapted the event into a hit miniseries, and the site is a popular tourist destination – leading to conjecture and misconception.
It resulted in only a few fatalities and casualties
For the past three decades, official reports of casualties and deaths from the Chernobyl accident have been surprisingly modest. Two people died immediately. Twenty-nine died in hospitals, and much later, 15 children died of Chernobyl-induced thyroid cancers.
These numbers have been repeated in recent articles in Newsweek and LiveScience.
Estimates of Chernobyl’s future health effects are also low: In 2006, researchers at the U.N. International Agency for Research on Cancer estimated that Chernobyl-induced cancers by 2065 will total 41,000, compared with several hundred million other cancers from other causes. Forbes even claimed that “only the fear of radiation killed anyone outside the immediate area,” by elevating rates of alcoholism and depression.

Photos of Chernobyl liquidators displayed at a 2010 Independent WHO protest in Paris, France. (WikiCommons)
The actual numbers may be far higher. Unfortunately, Belarus (where 70 percent of Chernobyl fallout landed), Russia and Ukraine have no public tallies of Chernobyl-related fatalities to update the count. But other state data gives us a rough sense of the number of people affected by the disaster over time.
In January 2016, for example, the Ukrainian government said 1,961,904 people in Ukraine were officially victims of the Chernobyl disaster. Ukraine also pays compensation to 35,000 people whose spouses died from Chernobyl-related health problems. These figures do not count Russia or Belarus, where estimates of cancers and fatalities are in the hundreds of thousands.
της Kate Brown

Φωτογραφίες των εκκαθαριστών που επιδείχθηκαν το 2010 σε ανεξάρτητη διαδήλωση WHO στο Παρίσι, France. (WikiCommons)

Ουαλλοί κτηνοτρόφοι και τα κοπάδια τους επηρεάστηκαν από τη ραδιενέργεια του Chernobyl επί δεκαετίες. (Photo: Rachel Davies, 2011, WikiCommons)

Great tits κοντά στο Chernobyl — στ αριστερά φυσιολογικό, στα δεξιά με καρκίνο προσώπου.

Οι αμερικανικές και σοβιετικές πυρηνικές δοκιμές απελευθέρωσαν 20 δισεκατομμύρια curies ραδιενεργού Ιωδίου από το 1945 μέχρι το 1962. (Photo: Castle Romeo, US Department of Energy)

Μέσα σε 36 ώρες από την πυρηνική καταστροφή , οι σοβιετικές αρχές μετακίνησαν 50,000 κατοίκους της πόλης Pripyat. (Photo: Jose Franganillo/Creative Commons)
By Jessica Urwin
In late April, the Australian federal government approved the Yeelirrie uraniam mine in Western Australia in the face of vigorous protest from traditional owners.
This Canadian-owned uranium mine is the newest instalment in Australia’s long tradition of ignoring the dignity and welfare of Aboriginal communities in the pursuit of nuclear fuel.
For decades, Australia’s desert regions have experienced uranium prospecting, mining, waste dumping and nuclear weapons testing. Settler-colonial perceptions that these lands were “uninhabited” led to widespread environmental degradation at the hands of the nuclear industry.
Read more:
It’s not worth wiping out a species for the Yeelirrie uranium mine
As early as 1906, South Australia’s Radium Hill was mined for radium. Amateur prospectors mined haphazardly, damaging Ngadjuri and Wilyakali lands. And an estimated 100,000 tonnes of toxic mine residue (tailings) remain at Radium Hill with the potential to leach radioactive material into the environment.
Uranium mines across Australia have similar legacies, with decades of activism from the Mirarr people against the Ranger and Jabiluka mine sites in Kakadu National Park.
By Jacqueline Cabasso
On July 1, at the close of its 87thAnnual Meeting, the United States Conference of Mayors (USCM), unanimously adopted a bold new resolution, “Calling on All Presidential Candidates to Make Known Their Positions on Nuclear Weapons and to Pledge U.S. Global Leadership in Preventing Nuclear War, Returning to Diplomacy, and Negotiating the Elimination of Nuclear Weapons”. The resolution calls on “all Presidential candidates of all political parties” to make these “priority issues in the 2020 Presidential campaign”.
The call comes at a time when the growing dangers of nuclear war have received little attention on the Presidential candidate debate stage or on the campaign trail. Citing the dangers of nuclear war and climate change as “twin existential threats,” in a July 6 op-ed, Dr. Ira Helfand of ICAN and IPPNW declared: “The enormity and imminence of these twin existential threats cannot be overstated and how to confront them must be the central issue of any presidential campaign.”
The USCM resolution quotes Renata Dwan, Director of the United Nations Institute for Disarmament Research, who “has declared that the risk of nuclear weapons being used again is at its highest since World War II, calling it an ‘urgent’ issue that the world should take more seriously”, and notes that according to the Congressional Budget Office, “U.S. spending for nuclear warheads, delivery systems and supporting infrastructure over the 2019 – 2028 period is projected to cost $494 billion, for an average of nearly $50 billion a year”.
In remarks to a plenary session of the USCM annual meeting on Sunday, June 30, Hiroshima Mayor Kazumi Matsui, President of Mayors for Peace, declared: “As mayors, you are working every day for the wellbeing of your citizens, but all your efforts could be for naught if nuclear weapons are used again. I would also like to point out that, while every one of the nuclear-armed states is spending billions of dollars to modernize and upgrade their arsenals, that money could be much more productively spent to meet the needs of cities and the people who live in them.”
Warning that “the U.S. announcement, followed by Russia’s, of their intention to withdraw from the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces (INF) Treaty effective in August 2019 are signs of deepening crisis among the nuclear-armed states,” the resolution “calls on all Presidential candidates to pledge their support for the joint 1985 declaration by U.S. President Ronald Reagan and Soviet President Mikhail Gorbachev, that ‘a nuclear war can never be won and must never be fought,’ as urged by United Nations Secretary-General António Guterres”.
By Carmen Grau
Where were you and what were you doing on that fateful day, 11 March 2011?
Eight years have gone by, and the then six to eight-year-old children are now high school students who use theatre as a channel for self-expression. Through their performance, they attempt to tell the story of their home towns and cities. It is also a way for them to assimilate the experience that changed the face of an entire region.
Still Life is the name of the play performed by six girls and six boys from the Futaba Future public high school in Fukushima. Aged between 15 and 17, the parts they play are based on their own life experiences. They tell the story of what the children went through, laying bare the complex web of emotions they have been caught in till this day. It is a tangled tale of love, childhood and suicide, seen through the unadulterated eyes of young people, who were just small children when the triple disaster struck. They are the youngest and will therefore be the last generation to keep a memory of those tragic events. And it is important for them to be able to share it.
The brown colour of the sea. A uniform left behind when a school was hastily closed down following the radiation alert. A teddy bear with a broken heart and the incessant ringing of a telephone searching for missing grandparents. Lampposts swaying dangerously on a hill, while children huddle together, remembering the adults’ instructions not to be left on their own. Innocently playing in a classroom with the water and sand spilt by the earthquake and cleaning it all up before heading for safety. Sleeping in the car with all the family when not a space was left in the sports centre. Memories of an earthquake, a tsunami, of radioactivity and the fear surrounding the decontamination process.
Par Carmen Grau
Le 11 mars 2011, où étais-tu et que faisais-tu ?
Huit ans ont passé et les enfants alors âgés de six, sept et huit ans sont aujourd’hui des lycéens qui s’expriment par le théâtre. Ils jouent la comédie pour raconter et rappeler ce qu’était leur ville. Et aussi pour s’approprier l’expérience de la catastrophe qui a changé la physionomie de toute une région.
Nature morte est une pièce de théâtre dont les protagonistes sont six filles et six garçons du lycée public Futaba Futur de Fukushima. Âgés de quinze, seize et dix-sept ans, ils interprètent des rôles qui pourraient être les leurs. Ils racontent comment les enfants qu’ils étaient ont vécu cette journée, dévoilant la trame complexe de sentiments qui les accompagnent jusqu’à la fin de l’adolescence. L’amour, la jeunesse et le suicide s’entremêlent sous le regard pur des jeunes, alors enfants, frappés par le triple désastre. Leur génération est la plus jeune et, par conséquent, la dernière, qui gardera ce souvenir. Pour eux, c’est important d’en parler.
La mer devenue marron. Un uniforme abandonné dans une école fermée précipitamment à cause des radiations. Un ours en peluche au cœur brisé et un téléphone qui n’arrête pas de sonner, à la recherche des grands-parents. Des lampadaires chancelants dans une rue qui monte pendant que les enfants se rassemblent, obéissant aux instructions des plus grands qui leur ont dit de ne pas rester seuls. Jouer innocemment dans une pièce avec de l’eau et du sable amenés là par le séisme et tout nettoyer avant de se mettre à l’abri. Dormir avec toute la famille dans la voiture parce qu’il n’y a plus de place dans le gymnase. Souvenirs d’un tremblement de terre, d’un tsunami, de la radiation et aussi de la peur des opérations de décontamination.